59 Deceits in Fahrenheit 9/11
^Good read^, even if you have not seen Fahrenheit 9/11.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left
Search the Frontier
Posts
Blog Archive
-
▼
2004
(38)
-
▼
September
(13)
- To draft, or not to draft, that is the question...
- Hostile Indians vs. Lewis and Clark
- This is funny
- Media bias
- Assault Weapons Ban
- Bush critics off their guard
- So this is what they mean by 'Evolution'
- Better then anthrax
- The #1 Enemy of Terrorism is....
- Fahrenheit 9/11
- Swiftboat Veterans vs. Kerry
- Hilarious pictures...
- French headscarf ban/French hostages discussion
-
▼
September
(13)
Contributors
With Honor to Ourselves and Profit to Our Patrons
1 comment:
Hi Liz!
Moore was being interviewed by O’Reilly and would not give an inch on Bush lying. He acknowledged that Bush relied on information that said there were WMD, but still claimed Bush was lying. I did not think O’Reilly approached the matter convincingly. I thought about this like someone taking a math test and they get three problems wrong. The didn’t “lie” on the test, they were just wrong. Bush didn’t lie about WMD, he was just wrong. Lying, by definition is an attempt to deceive. Moore has an agenda, he’s gone too far, and now, he has to stand by his ridiculous assertions.
Re: your web site. My wife’s name is Liz and she is a big Lord of the Rings fan (has read the trilogy 8 times, + The Hobbit & Sermerillian (sp)) and Jane Austin fan. My children love CastingCrowns.
BTW, thanks for filling in during my absence a few days ago on the WilderBlog. I was having a fit of productivity elsewhere and couldn’t participate.
Peace,
Prof. Ricardo
Post a Comment