On first blush, this smells of a throw away publicity suit. However, it is often easy to misjudge based on news reports. lets see if they have anything.
For negligence, they will have to show a legal duty owed to the plaintiffs and a breach of that duty. I'm not sure what legal duty these defendants owed. Second, I don't know how they would have breached a duty. Duty to warn? I think they did try to do what they could.
One thing is that IF (big IF) there was a recognizable duty, much of the loss of life could have been prevented since they only had to walk a mile inland to get out of the way.
I have not thought about it, but...venue? jurisdiction?
BTY check out my new space: http://feetman78.blogspot.com/
2 comments:
On first blush, this smells of a throw away publicity suit. However, it is often easy to misjudge based on news reports. lets see if they have anything.
For negligence, they will have to show a legal duty owed to the plaintiffs and a breach of that duty. I'm not sure what legal duty these defendants owed. Second, I don't know how they would have breached a duty. Duty to warn? I think they did try to do what they could.
One thing is that IF (big IF) there was a recognizable duty, much of the loss of life could have been prevented since they only had to walk a mile inland to get out of the way.
I have not thought about it, but...venue? jurisdiction?
BTY check out my new space: http://feetman78.blogspot.com/
Post a Comment