Thursday, September 21, 2006

United Nation Round-up

Or was that just the Democrat convention?

In any event, the three main speakers were President of the United States, George W. Bush, Modern Day Hitler, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran, and the crackpot leader of Venezula, Hugo Chavez.

Tuesday, Bush spoke at 11:00 to the general assembly. Some Highlights of his speech:
- "Some of the changes in the Middle East have been dramatic, and we see the results in this chamber. Five years ago, Afghanistan was ruled by the brutal Taliban regime, and its seat in this body was contested. Now this seat is held by the freely elected government of Afghanistan, which is represented today by President Karzai. Five years ago, Iraq's seat in this body was held by a dictator who killed his citizens, invaded his neighbors, and showed his contempt for the world by defying more than a dozen U.N. Security Council resolutions. Now Iraq's seat is held by a democratic government that embodies the aspirations of the Iraq people, who's represented today by President Talabani. With these changes, more than 50 million people have been given a voice in this chamber for the first time in decades. "

- "Some have argued that the democratic changes we're seeing in the Middle East are destabilizing the region. This argument rests on a false assumption, that the Middle East was stable to begin with. The reality is that the stability we thought we saw in the Middle East was a mirage."

-"Freedom, by its nature, cannot be imposed -- it must be chosen. From Beirut to Baghdad, people are making the choice for freedom. And the nations gathered in this chamber must make a choice, as well: Will we support the moderates and reformers who are working for change across the Middle East -- or will we yield the future to the terrorists and extremists? America has made its choice"

I heard this speech on the radio, and I thought it was pretty good. The people at the UN, however, clapped only once, at the very end, and that was just a speckling of polite aplause.

Enter Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
- "I am emphatically declare that today's world more than ever before longs for just and righteous people with love for all humanity, and above all longs for the perfect, righteous human being and the real savior who has been promised to all peoples and who will establish justice, peace and brotherhood on the planet. [The Twelfth Imam] Oh Almighty God, all men and women are your creatures and you have ordained their guidance and salvation. Bestow upon humanity that thirst for justice, the perfect human being promised to all by you, and make us among his followers among those who strive for his return and his cause"
Essentially, praying for the end of the world. Lovely thought.

Then, we've got Chavez.
- ""And the devil came here yesterday. Yesterday the devil came here. Right here." [crosses himself]"
And it smells of sulfur still today."
Yesterday, ladies and gentlemen, from this rostrum, the president of the United States, the gentleman to whom I refer as the devil, came here, talking as if he owned the world.
Truly. As the owner of the world. I think we could call a psychiatrist to analyze yesterday's statement made by the president of the United States.
As the spokesman of imperialism, he came to share his nostrums, to try to preserve the current pattern of domination, exploitation and pillage of the peoples of the world.
An Alfred Hitchcock movie could use it as a scenario. I would even propose a title: "The Devil's Recipe." "

And thats the gist of Chavez's speech.
And the UN continues down a steep down hill path. The US should pull out.

13 comments:

Meghan said...

HOLY COW!!!!

That's outrageous (chavez)

I agree that we need to back out of the UN but maybe that's what he wants....

Anonymous said...

Yep we need to pull out of the UN and stop giving them our financial "aid".
We fund the whole operation basically. We also supply most of the "peace-keeping" force too....
Oh and while we are at it can the UN move to Iran or China? It would be right at home there.

BTW now I can post with my beta blogger account yay. :)

Anonymous said...

hey, just saw your blog through World Mag, and decided to check it out. great work. :yep: you can check out my blog (which is pretty n00bish, but maybe you can liven it up) at [URL]http://www.christianguitar.org/forums/showthread.php?t=131759[/URL]

shadowsoflove.blogspot.com said...

Wonderful.
I agree completely, now we just have to convince the govenment...

RobertDWood said...

Aye, Chavez is nuts.

Thanks for dropping in Anon.

Seth, glad you can post now. And the financial aid is such a colassal waste of tax dollars...

Under, that is probably the hard part. :D

Anonymous said...

And Chavez wonders why his citizens still have to wait in line for toilet paper....

OK OK, I know they probably don't have to wait in line. Venezuela is wealthy due to oil.
The UN is one of the only organizations in the world where you get the same number of votes no matter how much money you donate (or leech off.) It would seem that giving the nations that donate more money more votes would be the obvious answer. Unfortunately that notion would get voted down by all the nations that are currently receiving more in aid then they are donating.

The issue of whether people/nations who don't contribute anything should be allowed to vote isn't new. The US consitution only allowed landowners to vote because the only tax back then was the property tax. Having to own land in order to vote meant that only people that contributed to government received a vote in government. Not a bad system really. Not perfect but not bad.
It should be noted that in the US a full 1/3 of voters pay no taxes. Essentially they receive money from the government without giving anything back.

P.S. I don't mean to make the 1/3 sound greedy or evil. Many are poor through no fault of their own. Still, many are taking advantage of the system.

Jon Scott Birch said...

Excellent analysis! And of course, such firebrands as Ahmadinejad and Co. are just the fare that Almighty God will use to bring about the gathering of evil upon the "mountains of Israel" whereupon they shall meet their doom (Ezekiel 38-39), and soon it would seem as the Russian, German, and Arab military mobilization toward and around Israel escalates (see Online Edition Jerusalem Post, Sep. 21).

Matt said...

Indeed. Let's get out of the U.N.

We need to stop polluting our image by consorting with that gang of thugs and losers.

Mercy Now said...

The UN is a joke. It's a place for corrupt leaders to boast their own arrogance in front of "the world". The fact that its Human Rights Committee is comprised of China, Algeria, Libya, Sudan, & S Africa (see source) shows its corruption. It's like letting murderers patrol your neighborhood.

TheEarthCanBeMoved said...

While I don't like the UN anymore than y'all.
I know our government isn't stupid.
They have their reasons for staying in.

RobertDWood said...

Tradition is a hard thing to alter, and the State department is pretty powerful.

faithful, Its a communist country. I'll bet they do have to wait in line for a lot of stuff.
For the voting system, it would be very very easy to portray it as a vote buying system.

Jon, these are indeed evil days.

But Raben, Those thugs and losers are part of our international community, and deserving of our resepct!! :D

Mercy, the human rights council is indeed a joke, and having Syria and Lybia on the security council is a terrible idea.

Nate said...

It's interesting to contrast our reaction to the Chavez and Ahmadinejad coments (disgust, dialouge) with the Muslim reaction to the much milder comments the pope made last week (Violent protest, threats of war).

Anonymous said...

Oh, I could think of a good Hitchcock movie with that title all right, but it certainly wouldn't be in reference to the President of the United States of America.