US Soldiers worse then Saddam?

Story: ""The absolute cynical manipulation, deliberately cynical manipulation, to shape American public opinion and 69 percent of the people, at that time, it worked, they said 'we want to go to war,'" Rockefeller told CBS News correspondent Sharyl Attkisson. "Including me. The difference is after I began to learn about some of that intelligence I went down to the Senate floor and I said 'my vote was wrong.'"

Rockefeller went a step further. He says the world would be better off today if the United States had never invaded Iraq — even if it means Saddam Hussein would still be running Iraq.

He said he sees that as a better scenario, and a safer scenario, "because it is called the 'war on terror.'"

Does Rockefeller stands by his view, even if it means that Saddam Hussein could still be in power if the United States didn't invade?

"Yes. [Saddam] wasn't going to attack us. He would've been isolated there," Rockefeller said. "He would have been in control of that country but we wouldn't have depleted our resources preventing us from prosecuting a war on terror which is what this is all about.""

So, let me get this straight. The world would be a better place with Saddam still in control of 26 million people?
So, then the world is a safer, better place when these 26 millions people are subject to arbitrary treatment without due process?
So, what happens in Saddams world:

• Suspension by the wrists for hours on end while naked.
  
• Electric shock to the ears, fingers genitals and tounge
• Swung from a rotating fan while being beating with whips, canes, pipes and hoses.
• Extraction of fingernails
• Mutilation by electric drill
• Rape and other sexual tortures
• Raping of family members
  
• Watching friends and family members recieving the above tortures.
• Beheading of a father in front of the family home

Yeah. And thats better then the US troops? I don't think so. What have US troops done?

• Repaired power to the region
• Restored fresh water
• Protected the democratic process in its infancy. (Purple Fingers anyone?)
• Captured the nazis, who are muslims, btw.

Which is better?

Now, look at the world at large. In the past, we had 3 allies in the region. Now we've got 5. Who's new? Iraq and the United Arab Emerates.
In the past, we had a ruthless, totalitarian dictator who supported terrorists, to the tune of 2000 a year, and exersiced torture and mass killings as a control mechanisim in his country.
The US? We've taken the fight to the terrorists in their backyard, and fighting them with those who are trained to kill enemies of the United States.
Rockerfeller is a liar, a traitor to his country, and a man who has allied himself with our enemies. And if the dems think this will give them the election, they had better be prepared for results that will have their heads spinning, as the balence of the house shifts dramatically to the right, and to a lesser degree, the senate.